Air Cargo Management

‘Hopes of cargo peak season uptick are dwindling’, says CLIVE Data Services

photo_camera Okay great! Could you help with this info:What was the route? Sharjah to DamascusWhat aircraft was chosen and why? B737F due to availability and aircraft that can operate to SyriaWhat was the cargo? Relief items tents/blanketsWhat was the reason for the flight? EarthquakeHow much cargo in tonnes? 11THow was it loaded? Through the sidedoor using a highloaderDid you need permits/did you work with anyone outside of ACS to gain permits? ACS Dubai helped procure aircraftDid you work with other ACS offices to arrange this charter? ACS DubaiWhen did enquiry come in and when did charter fly, how quick was it all arranged and flown? What was the configuration? Enquiry cam in Tues morning, landed Fri morningIf the carriers logo is showing in the photo, do you have permission to publish the photo or do we need to blur anything out on the image? Please blur carrier log and also UNICEF logo on cargoCan these images go on social media and please let me know if there is anything that cannot be mentioned. Thank you! ? Can you send me draft before publishing, we cant mention Unicef or KN*REMOVED ALL UNICEF, HIVIS LOGOS AND AIRCRAFT REG

Hopes for a traditional cargo peak this year are dwindling as the airfreight spot rate dipped to its lowest level in three years as supply outstrips demand.

The latest analysis by CLIVE Data Services, a part of the air and ocean analytics platform Xeneta, revealed rates in May fell to their lowest level since the start of the Covid pandemic in March 2020.

The global airfreight spot rate fell 40% in May compared to the same month in 2022, to $2.41 per kilogramme.

This coincided with aviation body IATA predicting airline cargo revenues and yields could fall by more than 31% and 29% respectively in 2023.

The CLIVE analysis found softening global air cargo demand saw a less severe year-over-year drop of -1% in chargeable weight in May, the smallest monthly decline in the past 12 months.

But the influx of belly capacity for the peak summer leisure travel market has ramped up downward pressure on rates. Global air cargo capacity in May continued its double-digit increase, up 14% year-on-year.

Less demand and more capacity led to an inevitable fall in dynamic loadfactor, CLIVE’s measurement of global volume and weight perspectives of cargo flown and capacity available. It was -5% points lower compared to May 2022 at 55%.

Niall van de Wouw, Xeneta chief airfreight officer, said it’s not only rising capacity which is causing restlessness.

“There are a lot of ambitious forwarders in the market that want to grow – but they cannot grow with their current customer bases because the airfreight demand is not there, so, as we highlighted in April, they are looking to take a bigger share from someone else.

“At the same time, we see a lot of shippers going to market now because they want to refresh their rates and benefit from the different conditions to three to six months ago.

“Challengers for their business – not the incumbent freight forwarders – smell a chance to buy volumes and are going in and offering low rates. And, whether they get the business or not, the overall rates drop because shippers often stick with their current provider but expect them to adjust their rates accordingly to this lower market level.”

CLIVE reported that the year-on-year decline of freight rates on most of the major fronthaul lanes in May outpaced the industry average.

In line with deteriorating PMI readings, the outbound Southeast Asia market experienced the largest year-on-year rate fall among top fronthaul corridors.

Its spot air cargo rates to the US and Europe fell 68% and 62% respectively over the month. Northeast Asia (excluding mainland China) to the US saw cargo rates slump 60% from a year ago.

The only exception was the China to the US corridor. It recorded a 31 per cent decline from a year earlier, below the industry average of -40 per cent and was the only corridor among these major lanes to experience a price surge from a month ago.

This was influenced by a small window of opportunity for air cargo in May, which stemmed from the latest dockworker absences due to persistent US west coast labor contract negotiations and weight limits set for passing through the Panama Canal due to low water levels.

However, with ocean freight demand matching the fortunes of air cargo, any benefit of some goods switching from ocean to air is likely to be short-lived and have little meaningful impact at a global level.

Van de Wouw said: “Shippers are the dominant players in the market right now, as freight forwarders and airlines are nervous of missing/losing the volumes that are actually offered in the market.

“It’s a time of ‘stick or twist’ for airlines and forwarders. Do they become more short-term driven and flick the ‘let’s-just-buy-the-volumes’ switch or do they sit it out? Do they take drastic action or hold their course? If companies become trigger happy in using such tactics, we could see more downward pressure on the air cargo market than the actual changes in demand and supply.

“In my conversations with airlines and forwarders during Transport Logistic in Munich in mid-May, I heard the market was slow, but there was no panic.

“But the overall market sentiment seems to be changing. Now, more airlines and forwarders are clearly getting nervous, are accepting the fact that hopes of an uptick in peak season demand later in the year are dwindling.”

Sign In

Lost your password?